Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
A

Anderson v. Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary

2013 WL 1405423 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Anderson v. Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary

United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
2013 WL 1405423 (2013)

Facts

Andre Anderson (defendant) was charged with second-degree murder based on the shooting death of Richard Holloway. At Anderson’s trial, the prosecutor asked Latarsha Smith, Carlos Stewart, and Alice Stewart whether Anderson told them why he killed Holloway. The witnesses testified that Anderson sold crack cocaine and that Anderson said that he killed Holloway because Holloway stole crack from Anderson. The jury convicted Anderson of Holloway’s murder. Anderson’s conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, and the state courts denied Anderson’s petition for postconviction relief. Anderson then filed a federal habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. One of Anderson’s alleged grounds for relief was that the trial court improperly allowed the prosecution to present other-crimes evidence of Anderson’s drug dealing even though the prosecution had not given proper pretrial notice of the intent to use the evidence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hornsby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Evidence

Key Terms