Andler v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.

670 F.3d 717 (2012)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Andler v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
670 F.3d 717 (2012)

Facts

Brandi Andler (plaintiff) and her boyfriend, Eric Heitzer, went to a country-music festival in Ohio. In connection with the festival, Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. (Clear Channel) (defendant) operated a campground nearby. One evening, Andler and Heitzer visited some friends who were staying at the campground. While there, Andler and Heitzer decided to walk around the campground listening to music played by other campers. As Andler and Heitzer walked to the bathrooms, Andler fell into a hole with grass growing out of it, breaking both of her feet. Andler sued Clear Channel for damages. At an initial trial, a jury ruled in Andler’s favor, but the ruling was overturned on appeal due to an issue with jury instructions. At the second trial, Andler argued that she was not able to see the hole because the grass growing in the hole had grown tall enough to appear level with the grass surrounding the hole. Vincent James testified that he had observed the hole with difficulty during the day and had alerted Clear Channel staff the day before Andler fell. Clear Channel asserted that it had not breached a duty to Andler because she held the status of a licensee rather than an invitee and because the hole she fell into was an open and obvious danger. Clear Channel moved unsuccessfully for a judgment as a matter of law. A jury ruled in Andler’s favor, though she was awarded less damages than in the first trial, causing her to appeal. The jury determined that the hole was not an open and obvious danger. Clear Channel cross-appealed the district court’s ruling that Andler’s legal status was an invitee and that her suit was not barred by the open-and-obvious doctrine.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership