Andy Wightman et al. v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
European Union Court of Justice
E.C.J. Case C-621/18 (2018)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
In 2019, the United Kingdom (UK) held a referendum on the question of whether the UK should remain in or leave the European Union (EU). The majority of votes cast in the referendum favored leaving the EU. On March 29, 2017, the UK formally notified the European Council of the UK’s intention to withdraw from the EU, beginning the two-year time period for negotiation of a withdrawal agreement under EU law. On June 19, 2017, the UK and the EU began negotiating the terms of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. Prior to the conclusion of a withdrawal agreement, members of the UK Parliament petitioned a UK court for a declaratory judgment specifying how the UK could revoke the UK’s notification of intention to withdraw from the EU. The UK court refused to request a preliminary ruling on the grounds that the question was merely hypothetical. However, on appeal, another UK court asked the European Union Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on whether an EU member state could revoke that state’s notification of intent to withdraw from the EU.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.