From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Angelopoulos v. Keystone Orthopedic Specialists, S.C., Wachn, LLC
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77721 (2017)
Dr. Nicholas Angelopoulos (plaintiff) sued Dr. Martin Hall (defendant). Angelopoulos sought to introduce opinion testimony of Dr. Michael Hartman on Hall’s character for untruthfulness. Hall planned to testify at trial. Hartman had known Hall for approximately six months because they both worked at Keystone Orthopedic Specialists. Hartman had spoken to Hall approximately once per week during that time. Hall filed a motion in limine to exclude Hartman’s opinion testimony.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Dow Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.