Anonsen v. Donahue

857 S.W.2d 700 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Anonsen v. Donahue

Texas Court of Appeals
857 S.W.2d 700 (1993)

Facts

Nancy Anonsen, joined by her husband and her biological son (plaintiffs), filed a claim against Anonsen’s mother, Miriam Booher, and television host Phil Donahue (defendants) in state court following Booher’s appearance on an episode of Donahue’s nationally broadcast television show. The lawsuit alleged invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts. The episode featuring Booher focused on pregnancies resulting from rape and incest. On the show, Booher discussed her ex-husband’s rape of Anonsen when Anonsen was a child and the resulting pregnancy and birth of her grandson. The rape was never reported to the authorities or publicly disclosed. Booher shared her own full name on the show but did not identify her ex-husband, daughter, or grandson. Anonsen did not dispute the truth of any facts presented by Booher. Anonsen argued that Booher’s disclosure of her own identity also disclosed Anonsen’s identity and exposed the circumstances of her rape and pregnancy to the nation. Anonsen had explicitly told Booher not to appear on the show or discuss the events. The district court granted a motion for summary judgment filed by Booher and Donahue. Anonsen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Oliver-Parrott, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership