Apex LLC v. Sharing World, Inc.
California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District, Division 3
206 Cal. App. 4th 999 (2012)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Apex LLC (Apex) (plaintiff) entered into 12 contracts to unconditionally sell over 19,000 tons of cottonseed to Sharing World, Inc. (Sharing World) (defendant) over the course of about 11 months. Sharing World intended to resell the cottonseed to third parties. Apex was aware that Sharing World would resell the cottonseed after receipt. Apex was also aware that Sharing World would not ship to a third party until the third party sent Sharing World a letter of credit. During the term of the contracts, the price of cottonseed dropped and the third parties stopped sending letters of credit to Sharing World. As a result, Sharing World refused to accept almost 15,000 tons of the cottonseed covered in the contracts. Apex brought suit against Sharing World. The trial court ruled in favor of Sharing World, finding that the contracts were subject to a verbal condition precedent—that Sharing World received letters of credit from the third parties. Apex appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fybel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.