Apodaca v. Oregon
United States Supreme Court
406 U.S. 404 (1972)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Apodaca, Madden, and Cooper (defendants) were all convicted of serious, unrelated crimes in jury trials in Oregon. Apodaca and Madden were convicted by a vote of 11–1; Cooper was convicted by a vote of 10–2. The defendants challenged their convictions on the grounds that a nonunanimous jury verdict in a criminal trial violates the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Concurrence (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.