Apple Valley Garden Association, Inc. v. MacHutta

763 N.W.2d 126 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Apple Valley Garden Association, Inc. v. MacHutta

Wisconsin Supreme Court
763 N.W.2d 126 (2009)

Play video

Facts

Steven and Gloria MacHutta (defendants) developed the Apple Valley Gardens condominium complex. The complex was officially established with the recording of a declaration. The declaration restricted the condominium’s units to single-family residential use and provided that rentals by unit owners would not relieve the unit owners of obligations created under the declaration. The declaration did not contain any restrictions on rental of the units. However, the condominium’s governing body, the Apply Valley Garden Association, Inc. (the association) (plaintiff) later amended the bylaws to prohibit unit owners from renting to new tenants. Gloria attempted to lease her unit to a new tenant. The association filed an action in the circuit court, seeking a declaratory judgment that the bylaws were enforceable. The MacHuttas argued that the rental restriction was unenforceable because it was not found in the declaration. The court granted summary judgment in favor of the association. The court of appeals affirmed. The MacHuttas appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gableman, J.)

Dissent (Prosser, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership