Archer v. Moody

544 S.W.3d 413 (2017)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Archer v. Moody

Texas Court of Appeals
544 S.W.3d 413 (2017)

Facts

W. L. Moody, Jr. (Junior) had a son, W. L. Moody, III (William), who in turn had three children of his own, Edna Moody, Virginia Moody, and Bill Moody. Junior created a trust to benefit his descendants. The trust was to terminate when the last of William’s children died. Article III of the trust stated that upon termination, the trust property was to be distributed in equal shares per stirpes to William’s then living grandchildren, and the surviving descendants of any deceased grandchildren. The trust terminated in 2014 with the death of Bill, William’s last surviving child. William had eight grandchildren, two from Edna’s line, two from Virginia’s line, and four from Bill’s line. A dispute arose as to the appropriate distribution of the trust property under Article III. Bill’s children (plaintiffs) argued that Article III required a per capita distribution to the grandchildren, with each grandchild taking an equal one-eighth of the trust property. Children from Edna’s and Virginia’s lines (defendants) argued that Article III required an initial division of the estate into thirds, with one-third allocated for each of William’s children. Then, each of the children’s children would take an equal share of their respective parent’s one-third. Under that scheme, each of Bill’s children would be entitled to only one-twelfth of the trust property (i.e., splitting Bill's one-third share four ways). In contrast, Edna’s two children and Virginia’s two children would each be entitled to one-sixth of the trust property (i.e., splitting Edna and Virginia’s respective one-third shares two ways). The probate court held that the trust instrument required a per capita distribution. The children from Edna’s and Virginia’s lines appealed to the Texas Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boyce, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership