Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC

784 F. Supp. 2d 398 (2011)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
784 F. Supp. 2d 398 (2011)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Lime Group LLC created and distributed the peer-to-peer file-sharing program LimeWire. LimeWire users employed the program to share and download digital copies of copyrighted music. Arista Records LLC and other record companies (collectively, Arista) (plaintiffs) sued Lime Group and related individuals and entities (collectively, LW) (defendants) for secondary copyright infringement. Arista sought summary judgment on its inducement-of-infringement claim; the parties cross-moved for summary judgment on Arista’s contributory-infringement claim; and LW sought summary judgment on Arista’s vicarious-infringement claim. Arista presented evidence showing that most files requested for download through LimeWire were copyrighted and not authorized for free distribution, internal LW documents acknowledged that LimeWire users downloaded copyrighted music without authorization, LW maintained an articles file labeled “Knowledge of Infringement,” articles about LimeWire users’ infringing activities appeared in newspapers, LW marketed LimeWire to users seeking to replace the shuttered file-sharing program Napster, LW conducted tests to improve LimeWire’s ability to search for and download unauthorized copies of recordings, LW assisted LimeWire users in sharing and downloading copyrighted music files, LW’s revenues grew as a result of LimeWire’s infringing capabilities, and LW failed to implement meaningful filters to limit infringement. LW presented evidence of LimeWire’s noninfringing uses, including sharing public-domain ebooks, and argued that additional noninfringing uses would likely be developed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership