Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
784 F. Supp. 2d 398 (2011)
Facts
Lime Group LLC created and distributed the peer-to-peer file-sharing program LimeWire. LimeWire users employed the program to share and download digital copies of copyrighted music. Arista Records LLC and other record companies (collectively, Arista) (plaintiffs) sued Lime Group and related individuals and entities (collectively, LW) (defendants) for secondary copyright infringement. Arista sought summary judgment on its inducement-of-infringement claim; the parties cross-moved for summary judgment on Arista’s contributory-infringement claim; and LW sought summary judgment on Arista’s vicarious-infringement claim. Arista presented evidence showing that most files requested for download through LimeWire were copyrighted and not authorized for free distribution, internal LW documents acknowledged that LimeWire users downloaded copyrighted music without authorization, LW maintained an articles file labeled “Knowledge of Infringement,” articles about LimeWire users’ infringing activities appeared in newspapers, LW marketed LimeWire to users seeking to replace the shuttered file-sharing program Napster, LW conducted tests to improve LimeWire’s ability to search for and download unauthorized copies of recordings, LW assisted LimeWire users in sharing and downloading copyrighted music files, LW’s revenues grew as a result of LimeWire’s infringing capabilities, and LW failed to implement meaningful filters to limit infringement. LW presented evidence of LimeWire’s noninfringing uses, including sharing public-domain ebooks, and argued that additional noninfringing uses would likely be developed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wood, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.