Logourl black

Arkansas Midland Railway v. Canman

Supreme Court of Arkansas
52 Ark. 517 (1890)


Facts

An Arkansas Midland Railway (Railway) (defendant) train derailed causing injuries to passenger Canman (plaintiff). Canman sued the Railway for negligence in Arkansas court. The jury was asked to give a general verdict and answers to written interrogatories. Several interrogatories sought a finding of fact regarding the specific cause of the derailment. The judge instructed the jury over the Railway’s objection that it could return a general verdict of negligence, even if it could not come to an agreement as to the specific cause. The jury could not agree on the cause of the derailment, but nevertheless returned a general verdict of negligence on the part of Railway. Railway appealed to the Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Battle, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.