Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 379 (1888)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Belden Mining Company (Belden) (defendant) contracted to deliver ore to Billing & Eilers. The price for each delivery was to be determined after the parties’ examination of each specific delivery. At times, an umpire would decide a fair price. Once a price was determined, Billing & Eilers would pay Belden. Thus, there was occasionally a significant time gap between delivery and payment. Belden had no security for its interest during this period. Billing & Eilers dissolved and assigned the contract to Mr. Billing. Belden did not object to this assignment. Thereafter, Mr. Billing assigned the contract to Arkansas Valley Smelting Company (Arkansas Valley) (plaintiff). Belden did not approve this assignment to Arkansas Valley and refused to perform. Arkansas Valley sued Belden. The lower court ruled in favor of Belden. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gray, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.