Armstrong v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
752 F.2d 1110 (1985)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Archie Armstrong (plaintiff) worked for the Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company (L & A) (defendant) as a brakeman. During a nighttime train trip in 1978, L & A instructed Armstrong to get off the train at a railroad crossing to help with other railcars on a sidetrack. L & A called a taxi from Miller Cab Company (Miller) to drive Armstrong from the crossing to the railroad’s office. The taxi driver waited in the roadway in the dark without turning on the taxi’s emergency flashing lights. As Armstrong was getting into the taxi, another car rear-ended the taxi, injuring Armstrong. Armstrong sued L & A and L & A’s parent company, Kansas City Southern Railway Company (KCS) (defendant), in federal district court under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). Under the FELA, railroad employees could recover damages for injuries caused by the negligence of any of the railroad’s officers, agents, or employees. L & A filed a third-party complaint against Miller, seeking indemnification under Louisiana law in case L & A was found liable to Armstrong. At trial, there was evidence suggesting that the taxi driver could not have pulled off the road onto the shoulder and that the driver who rear-ended the taxi should have seen the taxi. The jury found in Armstrong’s favor, concluding that the taxi driver’s negligence was a cause of Armstrong’s injuries. The district court entered judgment in accordance with the verdict. However, the district court dismissed L & A’s indemnity claim. The court disagreed with the jury and concluded that the collision resulted from the other driver’s negligence. The court further found that even if the taxi driver had been negligent, that negligence did not proximately cause Armstrong’s injury. L & A appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.