Associated Home Builders of the Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of Livermore
Supreme Court of California
18 Cal.3d 582, 557 P.2d 473, 135 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1976)
- Written by Anjali Bhat, JD
Facts
The City of Livermore (Livermore) (defendant) enacted an ordinance prohibiting issuance of new residential building permits until local educational, sewage-disposal, and water-supply facilities complied with specified standards. The stated purpose of the ordinance was to further the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Livermore and to contribute to the solution of air pollution. The Associated Home Builders of the Greater Eastbay, Inc. (Eastbay) (plaintiff) filed suit to enjoin the enforcement of the ordinance. The superior court issued a permanent injunction, and Livermore appealed. Eastbay argued the superior court’s injunction should be affirmed, because the ordinance was an unconstitutional exercise of the police power. Eastbay argued that nonresidents had a constitutional right to migrate to Livermore, and there was no compelling state interest justifying the ordinance.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tobriner, J.)
Dissent (Mosk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.