Atkinson v. Foote

44 Cal. App. 149 (1919)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Atkinson v. Foote

California Court of Appeal
44 Cal. App. 149 (1919)

Facts

Alfred Borchard and Mabel Borchard owned a piece of real property. The Borchards borrowed money from Mary Phleger in exchange for a promissory note and executed a first deed of trust on the property as security. The first deed of trust provided that it would also serve to secure optional future advances on the promissory note. Later, the Borchards executed a second deed of trust in favor of A. B. Atkinson (plaintiff). Atkinson foreclosed on the property and purchased the property at the foreclosure sale. Shortly thereafter, Alfred’s mother, Luise, purchased the promissory note and first deed of trust from Phleger. Luise lent Alfred and Mabel additional funds, which she represented as advances of the type provided for in the first deed of trust. Through her attorney, Luise was at all times fully aware of all transactions involving the property and Atkinson. Luise then foreclosed under the deed of trust and purchased the property at the foreclosure sale for $600 more than the initial face value of the promissory note. Atkinson sought the $600 for himself as excess. Luise claimed the right to the $600 to cover the advances she had made. Atkinson sued, and the trial court ruled in his favor. Luise appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership