From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
804 F.3d 202 (2015)
Google, Inc. (defendant) launched the Google Book Project. The project involved bilateral agreements between Google and research libraries. The libraries would select books from their collections to submit to Google for inclusion in the project. Google made a digital scan of each book and indexed them online. Users could go to the Google Books website and search for terms within the books. Users could also pull up a limited viewing of small portions of the books’ text. The libraries were allowed to download full copies of the digital images of the books they submitted to Google. Authors Guild (plaintiff) is an association of authors of copyrighted books that sued Google for copyright infringement for the Google Book Project work.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Leval, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.