B.K. v. Chambersburg Hospital

834 A.2d 1178 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

B.K. v. Chambersburg Hospital

Pennsylvania Superior Court
834 A.2d 1178 (2003)

SC

Facts

B.K. was 13 months old and suffered a seizure. His parents brought him to Chambersburg Hospital (the hospital) (defendant) for treatment. The paged doctor did not arrive to treat B.K. until an hour later. B.K.’s family (the family) (plaintiffs) sued the hospital for medical malpractice. The family sought to call Dr. Bonforte as an expert witness to testify regarding the standard of emergency-room care for pediatric seizures. Bonforte had two years of experience as an emergency-room doctor at the beginning of his career approximately 30 years before this proceeding. Further, Bonforte had spent four years as a member of the Special Emergency Room Oversight Committee at another hospital. Bonforte was also a division chief of pediatric ambulatory care from 1972 to 1982. Finally, Bonforte was the chairman of pediatrics at a respected hospital in New York City. The hospital filed a motion to exclude the testimony. The trial court granted the motion, ruling that Bonforte did not have sufficient recent experience dealing with emergency-room care for pediatric seizures but only worked in that field in a general, supervisory manner. The family appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership