B & W Glass v. Weather Shield Mfg.

829 P.2d 809 (1992)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

B & W Glass v. Weather Shield Mfg.

Wyoming Supreme Court
829 P.2d 809 (1992)

Facts

B & W Glass (plaintiff) sold and installed windows. Weather Shield Mfg. (defendant) manufactured windows. B & W contacted Weather Shield to obtain a price quote for a new project. Robert Schwalbe, a salesman for Weather Shield, telephoned B & W and provided a price quote for the windows. B & W never received written confirmation of this oral price quotation. Relying on this quote, B & W submitted its bid to the project’s general contractor. The bid was accepted. B & W contacted Schwalbe to tell him that B & W’s bid had been approved and that B & W would purchase Weather Shield windows for the project. B & W met with Schwalbe to review the plans and specifications in detail. B & W then signed a contract with the project’s general contractor. When B & W failed to receive drawings that had been promised by Schwalbe, B & W spoke with a Weather Shield supervisor. The supervisor informed B & W that Weather Shield would not be producing the windows. B & W then obtained windows from another manufacturer for over twice the price that Schwalbe had quoted. Weather Shield refused to pay B & W the difference between Weather Shield’s quoted price and the actual cost of the windows purchased from the other manufacturer. B & W field suit in state court. Weather Shield moved the case to federal court. The trial court found that Schwalbe was an authorized agent of Weather Shield. The court also held that, despite the statue of frauds, promissory estoppel had been established and the oral agreement between B & W and Weather Shield was enforceable. The court entered judgment against Weather Shield for breach of contract. Weather Shield then appealed the case. The appeals court certified the question of the enforceability of oral contracts to the state supreme court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership