From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...
Babcock v. Jackson
New York Court of Appeals
12 N.Y.2d 473, 240 N.Y.S.2d 743, 191 N.E.2d 279 (1963)
A car driven by William Jackson (defendant) crashed into a wall, injuring passenger Georgia Babcock (plaintiff). Babcock and Jackson were residents of New York, but the accident occurred in Ontario, Canada, during a weekend visit. When the accident occurred, Ontario statutory law stated the driver of a noncommercial vehicle was not liable for the injury or death of a passenger in the vehicle. New York had no such law. Babcock sued Jackson in New York state court. The trial court, applying Ontario law, dismissed the complaint. The appellate division affirmed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fuld, J.)
Dissent (Van Voorhis, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.