Bacardi v. White
Florida Supreme Court
463 So. 2d 218 (1985)
- Written by Paul Neel, JD
Facts
Adriana (plaintiff) and Luis (defendant) Bacardi divorced. The divorce decree incorporated the Bacardis’ agreement that Luis would pay Adriana $2,000 per month in spousal support. Luis stopped paying spousal support. Adriana obtained judgments amounting to $14,000 in unpaid support and $1,000 in attorney’s fees. Adriana also obtained an order permitting her to garnish funds of a trust created by Luis’s father for Luis’s benefit. The trust contained a spendthrift provision preventing the trustee, Robert White, from paying the trust funds in satisfaction of any judgment against Luis. The trial court nevertheless permitted Adriana to garnish the trust funds. Luis appealed. The intermediate appellate court reversed the trial court’s ruling. Adriana appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alderman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.