From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Bado v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
186 A.3d 1243 (2018)
Jean-Baptiste Bado (defendant) applied for asylum in the US. While his asylum application was pending, the government (plaintiff) charged Bado with misdemeanor sexual abuse of a minor, which subjected him to deportation under US immigration law. Bado pleaded not guilty. The trial court denied Bado’s demand for a jury trial and held a bench trial. Bado was convicted, sentenced to 180 days in jail, fined $50, and ordered to register as a sex offender. The US initiated deportation proceedings. Bado appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ruiz, J.)
Concurrence (Thompson, J.)
Concurrence (Washington, J.)
Dissent (Fisher, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.