Baidoo v. Blood-Dzraku
New York Supreme Court
5 N.Y.S.3d 709 (2015)
Ellanora Baidoo (plaintiff) filed a divorce action against Victor Blood-Dzraku (defendant). The parties never lived together, and Blood-Dzraku told Baidoo that he had no fixed home address and no place of business. Baidoo also did not have Blood-Dzraku’s email address. Baidoo hired an investigator to locate Blood-Dzraku but was unsuccessful. Accordingly, claiming that it was the only way she could serve him, Baidoo petitioned the court to permit her to serve Blood-Dzraku via his Facebook account. Baidoo submitted an affidavit verifying that the intended Facebook account actually belonged to Blood-Dzraku. In addition, Baidoo submitted an affidavit demonstrating that Blood-Dzraku frequently communicated with her via Facebook.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cooper, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.