Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC
United States Supreme Court
135 S. Ct. 2158 (2015)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
ASARCO (defendant) was a copper-mining firm. ASARCO faced financial trouble and eventually filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Relying on § 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, ASARCO hired two law firms (plaintiffs) to provide legal representation during the bankruptcy. The firms prosecuted fraudulent-transfer claims against ASARCO’s parent company and were able to obtain a large judgment in favor of ASARCO. The firms sought compensation under § 330(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. ASARCO, under control of its parent company, challenged the compensation requested by the firms. The Bankruptcy Court rejected ASARCO’s objections and awarded the firms compensation for their work in the bankruptcy proceeding. ASARCO appealed various aspects of the award to the District Court. The court held that the firms could recover fees for defending their fee application. ASARCO appealed, and the appeals court reversed the trial court’s ruling. The Supreme Court then granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (Sotomayor, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.