Baker v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
371 A.2d 699 (1977)
Baker (defendant) was charged with murder and robbery and sought to introduce evidence that the police had brought one of the victims to where Baker was being held and that the victim had said that Baker was not one of the people who attacked and robbed him. Baker sought to elicit testimony about this confrontation from Officer Bolton who was present at the time, but could not remember what occurred. As a result, Baker instead sought to introduce a police report that captured the confrontation to help refresh Bolton’s memory. The report was written by another officer. The trial court refused to allow Baker to so refresh Bolton’s memory on the grounds that he did not write the police report. Baker was then convicted and she appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Moylan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.