From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Bammert v. Don’s SuperValu, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
646 N.W.2d 365 (2002)
Karen Bammert (plaintiff) worked at Don’s Super Valu, Inc. (Don’s) (defendant) as an at-will employee for 26 years. Bammert’s husband worked as a police officer. On June 7, 1997, Bammert’s husband participated in the drunk-driving arrest of Nona Williams, who was the wife of the owner of Don’s. On August 28, 1997, Don’s fired Bammert in retaliation for her husband’s involvement in Williams’s drunk-driving arrest. Bammert sued Don’s for wrongful termination. The Dunn County Circuit Court dismissed Bammert’s complaint for failure to state a claim, because the case did not fall within the public-policy exception to the at-will employment doctrine. The court of appeals affirmed. Bammert appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sykes, J.)
Dissent (Bablitch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.