Bank of America, N.A. v. Kabba
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
276 P.3d 1006 (2012)
On March 11, 2010, Bank of America (plaintiff) filed an action to foreclose on a loan taken out by Momodu and Humu Kabba (defendants). Bank of America claimed to be the holder of the Kabbas’ promissory note. On January 17, 2011, Bank of America filed an “Assignment of Real Estate Mortgage” that evidenced an assignment of the interest in the Kabbas’ mortgage from BNC Mortgage, Inc. (BNC) to Bank of America as of February 9, 2010. The assignment did not mention the promissory note. Bank of America filed a motion for summary judgment. As part of the motion, Bank of America filed the promissory note, which was payable to the bearer. The Kabbas argued that Bank of America did not have standing to bring the foreclosure action. The trial court granted Bank of America’s motion. The Kabbas appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Combs, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.