Bank of Mendocino v. Baker

82 Cal. 114, 22 P. 1037 (1889)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 42,800+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bank of Mendocino v. Baker

California Supreme Court

82 Cal. 114, 22 P. 1037 (1889)

Facts

The Garcia and Point Arena Railroad Company (railroad) purchased title to a piece of land from Campbell. Campbell conveyed the railroad title in fee simple. The deed was never recorded; however, agents of the railroad (defendants) openly possessed the land for many years. Separately, two individuals had conveyed a right-of-way to the railroad, and the corresponding deed had been properly recorded. Years after conveying the land to the railroad, Campbell executed a mortgage on the same land to Abbott. Campbell defaulted on the obligation the mortgage secured, and Abbott held a foreclosure sale of the land. The foreclosure purchaser was Bank of Mendocino (bank) (plaintiff). The bank then filed an ejectment action against the railroad agents in possession of the land. The bank argued that, because public records listed only Campbell as titleholder to the land and the railroad as the holder of a right-of-way, the bank could purchase title to the land from Campbell without any further inquiry. The trial court denied the ejectment, and the bank appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Foote, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 684,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 684,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 42,800 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 684,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 42,800 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership