Bank of Mississippi v. Hollingsworth

609 So. 2d 422 (1992)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bank of Mississippi v. Hollingsworth

Mississippi Supreme Court
609 So. 2d 422 (1992)

SC

Facts

On April 11, 1983, Mamie Robinson conveyed a parcel of land by deed to Wayne and Debbie Hollingsworth (plaintiffs). At some point in 1983, the Hollingsworths enclosed the parcel with a fence. The Hollingsworths did not record the deed from Robinson until April 30, 1985. On January 24, 1984, Robinson executed a deed of trust to the Bank of Mississippi (defendant) for certain land. Included in the deed were 18 acres that Robinson had previously deeded to the Hollingsworths. The bank did not order a survey or physically inspect the land subject to the deed and recorded the deed of trust on the same day. In 1989, the Hollingsworths brought suit seeking cancellation of the bank’s deed as to the 18 acres. The Jones County Chancery Court found in favor of the Hollingsworths. The bank appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Banks, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership