Banks v. State
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
211 S.W. 217, 85 Tex. Crim. 165 (1919)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Tom Banks (defendant) was walking by a railroad track with a friend when the two men heard a train coming. The friend handed a gun to Banks and suggested that Banks shoot into the train. When the train went by, Banks shot into the train, killing a brakeman. Banks was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. On appeal, Banks argued that he could not be guilty of murder because no evidence existed that he had acted with malice aforethought, which was a required element of murder.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lattimore, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.



