Barcume v. City of Flint
Court of Appeals for the Eastern District of Michigan
819 F.Supp. 631 (E.D. Mich. 1993)
Barcume (plaintiff) and 12 other female law enforcement officers filed suit against the City of Flint (City) (defendant) and the Flint Police Officers Association (FPOA), alleging the Flint Police Department (FPD) engaged in discriminatory hiring and promotion practices, in violation of several civil rights statutes. After extensive discovery had been completed, Barcume filed a motion to amend the complaint, which the court granted. After Barcume filed the amended complaint, the City filed a motion to dismiss the amended counts, arguing that the statute of limitations had run on the additional claims.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Newblatt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 148,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.