Barker v. Price
Indiana Court of Appeals
48 N.E.3d 367 (2015)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Jason Price (defendant) advertised a van for sale. The advertisement stated that the van was a 1994 Ford E-350. John Barker (plaintiff) verbally agreed to buy the van. Barker and Price then signed a written agreement calling for Barker to pay a deposit and for Price to deliver the title to the van. The agreement did not contain an integration clause. The agreement also did not contain the model year of the van. Barker paid the deposit, and Price delivered the title, which stated that the van was a 1993 Ford E-350. Barker refused to accept the title, and Price refused to return the deposit. Barker sued Price for breach of contract. The trial court granted Price’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the model year of the van was not material to the agreement because it was not referenced in the agreement. Barker appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Najam, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.