Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc.

570 F.3d 1096 (2009)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
B
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
570 F.3d 1096 (2009)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Play video

Facts

Cecilia Barnes’ ex-boyfriend created false online profiles for her on a website run by Yahoo!, Inc. (Yahoo), and posted nude photos of her along with her work address, work email address, and work phone number. Barnes sent several requests to Yahoo to remove the content. Weeks later, Yahoo’s director of communications informed Barnes that he would take care of removing the content. Months later, the content had not been removed, and Barnes (plaintiff) brought suit against Yahoo (defendant) in Oregon state court, alleging negligent provision or non-provision of services which Yahoo undertook to provide, and promissory estoppel. Yahoo removed the action to federal court. The district court dismissed Barnes’ claims, finding that the Communications Decency Act provided Yahoo with immunity from liability. Barnes appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Scannlain, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 780,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Communication Law
Cyberspace
Torts

Key Terms