Bashi v. Wodarz
Court of Appeal of California
45 Cal. App. 4th 1314 (1996)
Margie Wodarz was involved in an automobile accident with Mubarak Bashi and Nasim Akhtar (plaintiffs). Just prior to the accident involving Bashi and Akhtar, Wodarz had been in another automobile accident with a third party and fled the scene. Bashi and Akhtar brought a claim against Wodarz, alleging negligence. At trial, Wodarz claimed that she had no control over her actions at the time and could remember very little about the two automobile incidents. Wodarz brought a motion for summary judgment, arguing that her sudden mental illness meant she was not negligent as a matter of law. The trial court granted the motion, and Bashi and Akhtar appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ardaiz, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.