Baxter House, Inc. v. Rosen

278 N.Y.S.2d 442, 27 App. Div. 2d 258 (1967)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Baxter House, Inc. v. Rosen

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
278 N.Y.S.2d 442, 27 App. Div. 2d 258 (1967)

Facts

George Rosen had several life-insurance policies with his daughters, Irene and Roslyn (collectively, the daughters) (defendants), designated as beneficiaries. In total, George paid $290,000 in premium payments over the course of more than a decade. After George’s death, the daughters collected nearly $2 million in proceeds from the policies. Baxter House, Inc. (Baxter) (plaintiff) and Vanderbilt Towers, Inc. (Vanderbilt) (plaintiff) sued the daughters for a constructive trust on a portion of the proceeds. Baxter and Vanderbilt alleged that George wrongfully converted $24,000 and $19,000 from them and used the converted funds to pay the premiums for his life-insurance policies near the end of George’s life, when he had become insolvent. Baxter and Vanderbilt sought a constructive trust over the same proportionate share of the proceeds as the converted funds were of the premiums paid of the policy. The trial court granted the daughters’ motion to dismiss because only a small portion of the premiums had been paid with converted funds and because George did not have a fiduciary relationship with Baxter and Vanderbilt. Baxter and Vanderbilt appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hopkins, J.)

Dissent (Rabin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership