Bedian v. Cohn
Illinois Appellate Court
134 N.E.2d 532, 10 Ill. App. 2d 116 (1956)
- Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD
Facts
Asadour and Elizabeth Bedian (plaintiffs) sold their property to Arnold Cohn (defendant) through an oral contract. The mortgage agreement contained a nonrecourse provision that stated Cohn would not be personally liable for any deficiency in the event of a foreclosure. When Cohn defaulted, the property value was not enough to cover the amount that Cohn still owed. The Bedians sued to recover the balance, and the chancellor held that the Bedians were entitled only to recover the property. The Bedians appealed and argued that the restriction on personal liability is void because an essential element of a mortgage is the promise to pay a debt.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scheineman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.