Benetton Services Corp. v. Benedot, Inc.
Alabama Supreme Court
551 So. 2d 295 (1989)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Benetton Services Corporation (Benetton) (defendant) and Benedot, Inc. (plaintiff) contracted for the sale and purchase of clothing. Pursuant to the contract, Benedot obtained an irrevocable letter of credit from Southland Bank of Dothan (Southland). The letter of credit assured Benetton that Southland would pay for the clothes on Benedot’s behalf and charge the payment to Benedot’s Southland account. The letter of credit was subject to interpretation under Alabama’s version of Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 5. Upon delivery, Benedot found that the clothes did not conform to contract specifications. Benedot sued and obtained a trial court’s temporary restraining order (1) enjoining Benetton from demanding payment on the letter of credit, (2) enjoining Southland from honoring any such demand, and (3) requiring Southland to escrow the money that was subject to the letter of credit. Benetton appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shores, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.