From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Benton v. Vanderbilt University
Tennessee Supreme Court
137 S.W.3d 614 (2004)
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Tennessee (Blue Cross) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Vanderbilt) (defendant) had a pricing contract for medical services that Vanderbilt provided to Blue Cross members. Under this contract, Vanderbilt agreed to accept what Blue Cross paid on a bill as full payment and to not charge a Blue Cross member for any unpaid bill amount. The contract also contained an arbitration provision requiring arbitration of any dispute that (1) was between the parties to the agreement and (2) involved the parties’ contractual rights or obligations. Larry Benton (plaintiff) was insured by Blue Cross when he was injured in a car accident. Vanderbilt treated Benton for his injuries and billed around $31,500 for the treatment. Blue Cross paid approximately $16,700 of this bill, leaving roughly $14,800 unpaid. Later, Benton sued the driver who had caused the accident. Vanderbilt sought to recover its unpaid $14,800 from any judgment that Benton might get from the driver, including filing a lien against the possible future judgment. Benton filed a lawsuit against Vanderbilt. Benton argued that Vanderbilt had contractually agreed to accept Blue Cross’s payment on the bill as the full payment and, therefore, that Vanderbilt had no right to continue to seek the unpaid bill portion. Vanderbilt moved to compel Benton to arbitrate the contractual dispute. The trial court denied the motion. The appellate court reversed, ruling that Vanderbilt could compel Benton to arbitrate the dispute even though he was only a third-party beneficiary of the contract and not a contractual party. The Tennessee Supreme Court agreed to review the issue.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)
Dissent (Birch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.