From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Berkemer v. McCarty
United States Supreme Court
468 U.S. 420 (1984)
A police officer suspected that McCarty (defendant) was driving while intoxicated and pulled him over. The officer asked McCarty to step out of the car and, when McCarty could not stand up straight, the officer decided he would be charged with a traffic offense. While McCarty was not yet told he would be taken into custody, at that moment he was no longer free to leave. The officer then asked McCarty whether he had been using intoxicants. McCarty answered in the affirmative. McCarty was then arrested and brought to the police station. At the station, McCarty was again questioned. At no point was McCarty read his Miranda warnings. McCarty moved to exclude both his statements made during the traffic stop and his statements made at the station house.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 606,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.