Berkemer v. McCarty
United States Supreme Court
468 U.S. 420 (1984)
- Written by Sarah Venti, JD
Facts
A police officer suspected that McCarty (defendant) was driving while intoxicated and pulled him over. The officer asked McCarty to step out of the car, and when McCarty could not stand up straight, the officer decided McCarty would be charged with a traffic offense. While McCarty was not yet told he would be taken into custody, at that moment he was no longer free to leave. The officer then asked McCarty whether he had been using intoxicants. McCarty answered in the affirmative. McCarty was then arrested and brought to the police station. At the station, McCarty was again questioned. At no point was McCarty read his Miranda warnings. McCarty moved to exclude both his statements made during the traffic stop and his statements made at the station house.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.