From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...
Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority
Court of Appeals of New York
703 N.E.2d 1214 (1998)
Bethel (plaintiff) was injured on a bus run by the New York City Transit Authority (defendant), when his seat collapsed under him. At trial, Bethel argued that the Transit Authority had constructive notice of the seat defect, and that an inspection would have revealed the defect and led to its repair. The trial court instructed the jury that the Transit Authority had a duty to exercise the highest standard of care to ensure passenger safety. The trial court instructed the jury to apply this heightened standard of care in deciding whether the Transit Authority had constructive notice of the seat defect that would have led to inspection and repair of the seat. The jury found for Bethel and the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division affirmed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Levine, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 203,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.