Bethurem v. Hammett
Supreme Court of Wyoming
736 P.2d 1128 (1987)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
The Bethurems (plaintiffs) entered into a contract with the Hammetts (defendants) to purchase the Hammetts’ home. The contract stated that the Hammetts were to provide marketable title to the Bethurems. The contract also stated that the Hammetts guaranteed the property was in compliance with all local laws, and that there were no known defects on the property except for those which were visible upon inspection. After moving in, the Bethurems discovered that a portion of the house, garage and fence encroached upon the street owned by the city in which the home was located. The Bethurems brought suit against the Hammetts, attempting to rescind the sales contract. The trial court ruled in favor of the Hammetts. The Bethurems brought this appeal to the Supreme Court of Wyoming.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Urbigkit, J.)
Dissent (Cardine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.