Big Cats of Serenity Springs v. Rhodes

843 F.3d 853 (2016)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Big Cats of Serenity Springs v. Rhodes

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
843 F.3d 853 (2016)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

Big Cats of Serenity Springs (Big Cats) (plaintiff) was a licensed wild-animal exhibitor subject to the Animal Welfare Act’s (AWA’s) care and sanitation standards. The Department of Agriculture’s (defendant) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) implemented the AWA. After a routine warrantless inspection of a Big Cats facility and two follow-up visits, APHIS inspectors issued citations for substandard care of two injured tiger cubs and directed Big Cats to transport the cubs for medical care. The following morning, after Big Cats’ director did not respond to phone calls, three APHIS agents (defendants) enlisted local sheriff’s deputies to break into the Big Cats facility by lying that APHIS had a court order to seize the cubs. The APHIS agents left after learning that the cubs were at a veterinary clinic. Big Cats sued various agents of the federal government, bringing a Bivens claim and a civil suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied the government’s motion to dismiss, and the government filed an interlocutory appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tymkovich, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership