Big Cats of Serenity Springs v. Rhodes
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
843 F.3d 853 (2016)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
Big Cats of Serenity Springs (Big Cats) (plaintiff) was a licensed wild-animal exhibitor subject to the Animal Welfare Act’s (AWA’s) care and sanitation standards. The Department of Agriculture’s (defendant) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) implemented the AWA. After a routine warrantless inspection of a Big Cats facility and two follow-up visits, APHIS inspectors issued citations for substandard care of two injured tiger cubs and directed Big Cats to transport the cubs for medical care. The following morning, after Big Cats’ director did not respond to phone calls, three APHIS agents (defendants) enlisted local sheriff’s deputies to break into the Big Cats facility by lying that APHIS had a court order to seize the cubs. The APHIS agents left after learning that the cubs were at a veterinary clinic. Big Cats sued various agents of the federal government, bringing a Bivens claim and a civil suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied the government’s motion to dismiss, and the government filed an interlocutory appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tymkovich, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.