From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...
Bill Diodato Photography, LLC v. Kate Spade, LLC
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
388 F. Supp. 2d 382 (2005)
Bill Diodato, a fashion-accessory photographer and the owner of Bill Diodato Photography, LLC (BDP) (plaintiff) took a photograph as part of a series featuring fashion accessories. The photograph depicted a view from outside the bottom portion of a bathroom stall, showing a woman’s feet in stylish shoes, astride a toilet, with a light brown handbag resting on the floor. The photograph was not published in the series and Diodato chose to submit the copyrighted photograph to Kate Spade, LLC (Spade) (defendant), a fashion accessory company. Ten months later, Spade ran an advertising campaign that included a similar photograph taken from outside the bottom of a bathroom stall showing a woman’s feet in stylish shoes, astride a toilet, with a handbag on the floor. Spade’s photograph was similar to BDP’s photograph in scene and concept, but comparatively unique in its mood, colors, lighting, object depth, and view. BDP brought suit against Spade under the Copyright Act for copyright infringement. BDP alleged that Spade actually copied the copyrighted photograph after Diodato submitted it and that Spade’s photograph was substantially similar. Spade argued that the scene and concept of BDP’s copyrighted photograph was an idea that had been used often in the popular culture and was not a protectable element. Spade argued that any substantial similarity between the photographs was unrelated to protectable elements of the copyrighted work and was not actionable as a copyright infringement. Spade moved for summary judgment on the copyright-infringement claim.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.