Biondi v. Nassimos

692 A.2d 103 (1997)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Biondi v. Nassimos

New Jersey Superior Court
692 A.2d 103 (1997)

Facts

Thomas Bondi (plaintiff) was the Chairman of the New Jersey Board of Examiners of Master Plumbers. The board held a public meeting at which it announced that Joseph Fichner, Jr. a master plumber and member of the New Jersey Society of Professional Energy and Environmental Contractors (NJSPEEC), had committed misconduct, fraud, and misrepresentation. Fichner was fined, ordered to pay restitution to clients, and had his license suspended for five years. In the meeting, Antoine Nassimos (defendant), a liaison between the NJSPEEC and the board, accused the board of improperly leaking information about its discipline decision before taking an official action. Nassimos also accused Biondi of having an improper relationship with the NJSPEEC. Nassimos then accused Biondi of having mob connections and of threatening to order a hit on Nassimos if Nassimos did not stop complaining about Biondi. Biondi brought a slander action against Nassimos. Nassimos filed a motion for summary judgment, which was denied. The jury declared a mistrial. Nassimos renewed his motion for summary judgment, and it was granted. Biondi appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Skillman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership