Bisby v. State
Texas Court of Appeals
907 S.W.2d 949 (1995)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Jerry Bisby (defendant) was charged with a crime. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) called Jack Ford as a witness. Ford refused to take the traditional witness oath on religious grounds. The trial judge considered the issue and ultimately allowed Ford’s testimony after Ford agreed to answer the questions posed “accurately and truthfully . . . under the penalty of perjury.” Bisby was convicted, and he appealed, arguing that Ford’s testimony should not have been permitted without a more proper oath.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Livingston, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.