Blanchard & Co., Inc. v. Barrick Gold Corp.

2003 WL 22071173 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Blanchard & Co., Inc. v. Barrick Gold Corp.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
2003 WL 22071173 (2003)

Facts

Blanchard & Company, Inc. and others involved in gold retailing, investing, or mining (collectively, Blanchard) (plaintiffs) sued Barrick Gold Corporation (Barrick) and J.P. Morgan Chase & Company (Chase) (defendants), alleging that Barrick and Chase violated federal and Louisiana antitrust law by manipulating the price of gold and monopolizing the gold market. Specifically, Blanchard attacked Barrick’s gold-sales program (program) that involved Chase (or another bank) acting on Barrick’s behalf to borrow gold from a foreign central bank on favorable terms that were not available to other gold-industry participants. Blanchard requested an injunction terminating all contracts through which Barrick and Chase allegedly manipulated the price of gold. Barrick responded that the act-of-state doctrine barred Blanchard’s claims because the program involved the leasing of gold from central banks, and Blanchard’s requested remedy could impact foreign central banks. Barrick and Chase filed motions to dismiss.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Berrigan, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership