Blanchard & Co., Inc. v. Barrick Gold Corp.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
2003 WL 22071173 (2003)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Blanchard & Company, Inc. and others involved in gold retailing, investing, or mining (collectively, Blanchard) (plaintiffs) sued Barrick Gold Corporation (Barrick) and J.P. Morgan Chase & Company (Chase) (defendants), alleging that Barrick and Chase violated federal and Louisiana antitrust law by manipulating the price of gold and monopolizing the gold market. Specifically, Blanchard attacked Barrick’s gold-sales program (program) that involved Chase (or another bank) acting on Barrick’s behalf to borrow gold from a foreign central bank on favorable terms that were not available to other gold-industry participants. Blanchard requested an injunction terminating all contracts through which Barrick and Chase allegedly manipulated the price of gold. Barrick responded that the act-of-state doctrine barred Blanchard’s claims because the program involved the leasing of gold from central banks, and Blanchard’s requested remedy could impact foreign central banks. Barrick and Chase filed motions to dismiss.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Berrigan, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.