Blazer Financial Services, Inc. v. Harbor Federal Savings & Loan Association

623 So. 2d 580 (1993)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Blazer Financial Services, Inc. v. Harbor Federal Savings & Loan Association

Florida District Court of Appeal
623 So. 2d 580 (1993)

Facts

In 1989, Harbor Federal Savings & Loan Association (Harbor Federal) (defendant) loaned money to Dubose Jewelry Company, Inc. (Dubose Jewelry). To secure the loan, Dubose Jewelry gave Harbor Federal an interest in its inventory and then-existing and after-acquired accounts and chattel paper. Harbor Federal filed the requisite financing statements regarding its interest. In March of 1990, Blazer Financial Services, Inc. (Blazer) (plaintiff), which often bought accounts receivables from retailers, purchased a series of sales contracts, accounts receivable, and security agreements (the sales contracts) from Dubose Jewelry. The sales contracts had a face value of $107,567.53, and Blazer purchased the sales contracts for $64,876.51. Many of the sales contracts were evidenced by chattel paper. Blazer took possession of all the sales contracts evidenced by chattel paper except 29 of them. In June of 1990, Dubose Jewelry filed for bankruptcy. Harbor Federal then sued Blazer for conversion of its collateral. Blazer claimed that it had priority over Harbor Federal’s security interest under Uniform Commercial Code § 9-308. The trial court found that Blazer had priority in the chattel paper under § 9-308 but limited the statutory protection to the amount of new value paid. Accordingly, the trial court awarded Harbor Federal $42,691.02 in damages, which represented the difference between what Blazer paid for the chattel paper and the chattel paper’s face value, plus prejudgment interest and costs. On appeal, Blazer argued that it was entitled to take the chattel paper free of Harbor Federal’s security interest under § 9-308.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dell, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership