Blockburger v. United States

284 U.S. 299 (1932)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Blockburger v. United States

United States Supreme Court
284 U.S. 299 (1932)

Play video

Facts

Blockburger (defendant) was indicted under the Harrison Narcotic Act on five counts for selling prescription drugs. The jury convicted him on the second, third and fifth counts. The second count charged Blockburger with selling morphine on a specified day. The third count charged Blockburger with selling morphine, not in or from the original stamped package, to the same purchaser on the following day. The fifth count charged Blockburger with having made this second sale to the same purchaser not in pursuance of a written order by the purchaser. Blockburger argued that the second and third counts constitute the same crime because the sales were made to the same person only a day apart. He also argued that the third and fifth counts constitute the same offense because the prohibition against selling narcotics not in its original packaging, and against selling to a purchaser not in pursuance of a written order by the purchaser, are found in the same statute. The court of appeals affirmed Blockburger’s conviction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sutherland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership