Blue Calypso, LLC v. Groupon, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
815 F.3d 1331, 118 U.S.P.Q.2d 1035 (2016)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Blue Calypso, LLC (plaintiff) held patents involving a peer-to-peer advertising system for use on mobile devices. Blue Calypso brought an infringement action against Groupon, Inc. (defendant) in federal district court. Groupon requested a United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) review of the patents’ validity under § 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. That provision established a temporary program under which the validity of patents were subject to post-grant review by the PTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the board) if the claimed inventions were deemed covered business methods—that is, methods involving financial activity. The board determined that the claimed inventions qualified as covered business methods lacking any technological invention, therefore subjecting the patents to post-grant review under § 18. The board then determined that the patents were invalid for claiming nonpatentable subject matter. Blue Calypso appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, arguing that the patents were not covered-business-method patents.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.