Blue Calypso, LLC v. Groupon, Inc.

815 F.3d 1331, 118 U.S.P.Q.2d 1035 (2016)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Blue Calypso, LLC v. Groupon, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
815 F.3d 1331, 118 U.S.P.Q.2d 1035 (2016)

Facts

Blue Calypso, LLC (plaintiff) held patents involving a peer-to-peer advertising system for use on mobile devices. Blue Calypso brought an infringement action against Groupon, Inc. (defendant) in federal district court. Groupon requested a United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) review of the patents’ validity under § 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. That provision established a temporary program under which the validity of patents were subject to post-grant review by the PTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the board) if the claimed inventions were deemed covered business methods—that is, methods involving financial activity. The board determined that the claimed inventions qualified as covered business methods lacking any technological invention, therefore subjecting the patents to post-grant review under § 18. The board then determined that the patents were invalid for claiming nonpatentable subject matter. Blue Calypso appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, arguing that the patents were not covered-business-method patents.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership