From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
BN v. KK
Maryland Court of Appeals
538 A.2d 1175 (1988)
- Written by Kheana Pollard, JD
Facts
BN (plaintiff) worked as a nurse at a hospital, where she met KK (Dr. K) (defendant). BN and Dr. K began to date and engage in sexual intercourse. At the time of the relationship, Dr. K had genital herpes and did not disclose this to BN. Dr. K also did not disclose when his disease was active and likely to pass on to BN during intercourse. As a result, BN was diagnosed with genital herpes. BN brought a fraud claim against Dr. K. Dr. K argued that he did not have a duty to disclose because the parties did not have a confidential relationship. The trial court found in favor of Dr. K. BN appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Adkins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
