Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico

457 U.S. 853, 102 S.Ct. 2799, 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico

United States Supreme Court
457 U.S. 853, 102 S.Ct. 2799, 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982)

JL
Play video

Facts

Three board members of the Board of Education of the Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 (the board) (defendant) attended a conference sponsored by a politically conservative organization. The conference distributed a list of books that were described as objectionable and improper fare for school students. The members discovered that 10 of those books were contained in the school district’s libraries. The board then directed that the 10 books be removed from the libraries and delivered to the board for review. This action was publicized, and the board issued a press release that described the books as anti-American, anti-Christian, and anti-Semitic. The board appointed a committee to review the books and recommend whether to return them to the libraries. The committee recommended returning at least five of the books. The board rejected the committee’s recommendations without explanation. The board decided to permanently remove nine books and make the tenth book available only with parental approval. A group of students from the school district (plaintiffs) sued the board, alleging that the removal of the books violated the First Amendment. The district court granted the board’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the claims. The plaintiffs appealed, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the decision and remanded the case. The board petitioned to have the Second Circuit’s decision overturned, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

Concurrence (White, J.)

Concurrence (Blackmun, J.)

Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)

Dissent (Burger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 779,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership